Intrauterine device removal from the sigmoid colon during a screening colonoscopy.

نویسندگان

  • Ana García-Rodríguez
  • Marco Álvarez
  • Agustin Seoane
چکیده

An intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective method of contraception and is associated with few side effects; however, uterine perforation and migration of the IUD to adjacent organs including the colon have been reported. A 54-year-old woman without relevant medical history underwent a screening colonoscopy. A cylindrical foreign body measuring 25×1mm and penetrating the wall of the sigmoid colon was detected, and was easily removed using a snare (●" Fig.1). The foreign body was later confirmed to be an IUD. The woman remained asymptomatic but a computed tomography scan was performed to rule out complications and no sign of perforation was found. Subsequently, the woman reported that she had undergone insertion of an IUD a few months before falling pregnant at the age of 34. She explained that the IUD had not been found inside her uterus when pregnancy ultrasound scans were performed but, despite that, the woman had given birth naturally. Finally, the patient was discharged and was scheduled to undergo the screening colonoscopy, during which a normal mucosal defect closure was observed. IUDmigration to the colonusually requires surgical intervention. Endoscopic IUD removal has been reported from the rectum, which ismainly extraperitoneal. However, we have only found one case involving the sigmoid colon where clips were used to close the wall defect [1]. In circumstances where a thin foreign body has been embedded in the bowel wall for a long time, we believe that endoscopic removal is safe because the fistulous tract collapses spontaneously and does not require mucosal defect closure or additional interventions. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AD_2AH

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Laparoscopic removal of an intrauterine device from the sigmoid colon

Uterine wall perforation which is commonly seen through the posterior wall of the uterus is the most serious complication of an intrauterine device (IUD). We present a case of laparoscopic removal of an IUD from the sigmoid colon in a 31-years-old female who was admitted to hospital with a history of pelvic pain and abnormal vaginal bleeding for one month. The dislocated IUD was removed from th...

متن کامل

Sigmoid Perforation during CT Colonography in a Patient with an Inguinal Hernia and Concomitant Finding of a Right-Sided Colon Cancer

The use of computed tomography colonography or virtual colonography (VC) is gaining acceptance as a screening modality for colon cancer. A comprehensive understanding of VC complications is limited. We report a case of colon perforation in a patient where a colon cancer was diagnosed using VC colonography with manual insufflation. A 79-year-old patient underwent a VC after a failed screening op...

متن کامل

Laparoscopic Removal of a Copper Intrauterine Device from the Sigmoid Colon

IUD translocation to the sigmoid colon after uterine perforation is a rare but serious event. Removal of the IUD in such a situation has been recommended because of the risk of complication, such as fistula formation and colonic perforation. We present the case of a 43-year-old female with a copper T380A IUD embedded in the sigmoid colon, which was removed with minimally invasive techniques.

متن کامل

Sigmoid Colon Migration of an Intrauterine Device

Background. Intrauterine devices (IUD) are commonly used birth control methods. Colonic perforation is an infrequent but serious complication of IUD. Case. A 34-year-old woman with 2-years history of IUD, inserted at early puerperal period, presented to gynecologist with chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia. Radiological assessment revealed that there were two copper-T devices: one in uterine ca...

متن کامل

Giant Submucosal Lipoma of Sigmoid Colon

  Lipomas of the gasterointestinal Tract are relatively uncommon in clinical practice. Most cases are asymptomatic with small tumor size and do not need any special treatment but the large ones are known to cause symptoms such as abdominal pain, obstruction, intussusceptions, and bleeding. The majority (90%) of these lesions are submucosal with predominantly right sided with a slight preponder...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Endoscopy

دوره 47 Suppl 1 UCTN  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015